![]() |
||
Quick Facts:
This is a copy of the
historic building document ![]() top More to come |
||
|
||
| Satellite view of farm. Please note: Boundaries are approximate. | ||
Zoning
Impact: On August 2nd 2004, the North Brunswick Town
Council voted 4-2 to change the Zoning of the Pulda Farm
from the R-1 (single family residential) as it had been for
decades, to PAC (planned adult community). Robert Corbin
and Adam Weiss cast the only dissenting votes against the
zoning change. R-1 Zoning requires almost half an acre of usable land, per house. This works out to a density of approximately 2.3 homes per usable acre. Not all the farm is buildable as there are wetlands, easements and the space for roads. This cannot be counted for housing acreage. For this land, R-1 construction would yield an estimated 70 upscale homes and at an estimated 3 cars per household, 210 cars. These upscale homes would be paying much higher property taxes than the average residence in North Brunswick. Under the PAC zoning, this same land will yield approximately 325 units, and with an average of 2 or more cars per unit, the traffic of at least 700 cars will be added to this small area. If the builder takes advantage of all the density bonuses offered by PAC zoning (and why wouldn't they, it's more profit), they are allowed to build at 4.85 homes per acre. However this is 4.85 homes per TOTAL acres not USABLE acres. Assuming the housing is on the same buildable land available to R-1 construction, the actual average density on usable land exceeds 11 units per acre! While there are many options available to the builder, to maximize the project profit under the PAC rezoning, there will most likely be 40% detached single family units, 25% duplex units & townhouses and 35% 'flats'. 15% of the housing will be 1500 square feet or less. Flats are large 4-story apartment house like buildings, a lower parking level, 3 residential housing levels (with a total of 45 units), plus the roof for a combined height of 50'. There is in addition a 50' tall allowable community center (residents only!). These 3 large buildings are expected to be situated on the outer perimete of the property in full view of everyone in the area. No one questions there will be additional pollution in the area from high-density housing. The loss of unpaved land for which rainwater can percolate back into the ground creates secondary effects. No only is the rain unable to percolate down and recharge the water table, it will run off into the lake bringing pollutants of a high-density housing community with it. Farrington Lake is drinking water supply.The PAC is expected to be costly to purchase and maintain, making it out of reach for most of the population it is intended for. Lakefront housing will sell for a premium, be charged premium taxes plus have monthly maintenance fees as well. It has been estimated that the average unit carrying costs (taxes and fees) are in the order of $11,000 to $14,000 per year. The PAC only requires that a single resident of each household be over 55 years old. All other residents can be of any age over 21.North Brunswick's own traffic study by Orth - Rogers Associates, indicates that the High Density age restricted housing will generate more traffic and peak hour traffic than R-1 single-family homes. This was even with using the flawed metrics of only .2 cars per household traveling during peak hours. This unrealistic formula is trying to tell us that only 1 in 10 residents would be traveling during peak hours. However, the majority of the residents are expected to still be working, and many will have to in order to pay the high cost of living at this location. For a more realistic evaluation, if we say only half as many people per unit in the PAC are working, as compared to non-age restricted single family homes, the traffic will be 250% greater. |
||
NBRAHDH: North Brunswick
Residents Against High Density Housing |
||