Save the Pulda Farm in North Brunswick, NJ
Click here for Urgent News  

Click here to link to older news stories

Middlesex County wants North Brunswick farm declared green space
by Tom Haydon/The Star-Ledger
Sunday April 26, 2009, 12:29 PM


Jennifer Brown/The Star-Ledger

Middlesex county agreed to pursue acquisition of Pulda Farm, in North Brunswick, for open space. Resident David Barnhard has pushed for 10 years to get land the preserved. Deer run through the dry leaves on the wooded edges of the Pulda farm near the back of the property that reaches the banks of the Farrington Lake, which marks the border between East Brunswick and North Brunswick.
More than 400 hundred yards to the west, at the front of the farm on Old Georges Road and Route 130 in North Brunswick, drivers rush past too hurried to noticed the stretch of fields still covered with the remains of corn stalks.

''The most interesting thing about this piece of property is nobody knows it's here,'' said David Barnhard, who has pushed for 10 years to get the 70-acre farm preserved.

Middlesex County freeholders last week took a step toward buying the 70 acres to preserve it as open space, a goal that has eluded three North Brunswick administrations and many township residents.

''We are thrilled to hear the county is interested in pursuing this. It's the right thing to do,'' said Peter Mainone, a member of the citizens group that filed a costly lawsuit over the 2004 re-zoning of the land to allow a high-density, 340 age-restricted adult community to prevent single-family homes that would attract young families requiring costly public services.

Since the mid-1990s, three North Brunswick mayors have tried unsuccessfully to buy the land from the Pulda family. Instead, the owners signed a contract with Edgewood Properties, a company owned by the powerful and politically connected Jack Morris.

 

Township officials estimate the appraised value at about $12 million, but say Morris wants more.

''We'd like to have it. We can't pay an exorbitant price,'' North Brunswick Mayor Francis (Mac) Womack said.

Womack wrote to the freeholders last year and made a presentation to the county open space committee earlier this year, and the committee recommended the freeholders try to buy it.

North Brunswick already owns some land along Farrington Lake, and East Brunswick and Milltown have property along the opposite bank, said Ralph Albanir, county director of parks and recreation.

''We are trying to make a continuous greenway. We're hoping to connect the dots. It's a very nice piece of land. The property fits in with the open space,'' Albanir said.

The improvement authority will assess the land, making sure there is an accurate appraisal and the tract meets environmental standards for open space, then try negotiating a purchase.

''If the property comes in at an extremely high price beyond what the appraisers are telling us, then it won't be purchased,'' Albanir said.

Barnhard wanted the township to take the property a decade ago.

''Pulda was on the list to be preserved in 1999, said Barnhard, who served on the township open space committee that recommended buying the tract.

He and others wanted the farm used for recreation space, but in 2003, North Brunswick bought the 104-acre Otken family farm off Route 130, paying just under $10 million, and converted it playing fields.

In 2004, the township re-zoned the land, exchanging a single-family designation that would have allowed 70 or 75, to a zone that would allow 340 age-restricted units for resident 55 years old and older.

Angered residents from a group opposed to high-density development filed suit in court in an unsuccessful attempt to overturn the zone change.

Now Barnhard and others want the farm left as it is -- maybe with a few walking trails or a boat launch at the lake.

''It should be preserved as passive open space. Just leave it be,'' said Barnhard. This is a gorgeous place,'' he said.

A call to Doug Wolfson, the lawyer representing Edgewood Properties, was not returned. There was no response to questions submitted to Edgewood Properties on Friday.

 

 

Great News! NJ state appellate court reinstates Pulda farm lawsuit! Case must be heard outside of Middlesex County lessening the impact of some middlesex residents political/personal agenda. NBRAHDH are pleased to announce the retention of Stuart Lieberman, a lawyer specializing in environmental and land use law. Concerned residents will be contacted by phone and asked to join in our effort to keep the farm as open space.
Development hearing to court for hearing Sept. 18 Note: Hearing has been rescheduled for Sept. 24

Note: Hearing has been rescheduled for Sept. 24
Development heading to court for hearing Sept. 18

BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer: The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0907/front_page/010.html

NORTH BRUNSWICK - There is still a chance that the Pulda farm along Georges Road and Route 130 will not be developed as high-density housing.

North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing (NBR), a citizens group composed of about 500 residents who oppose building a condensed housing development on the last farm in the township, has taken issue with the zoning of the property being changed from residential to planned adult community. Although the lawyer for Edgewood Properties, the developer of the 67-acre farm, had said his firm made an agreement with NBR to settle the issue, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division reinstated the lawsuit brought forth by NBR. That lawsuit questioned whether a settlement had been reached by the grassroots organization and Edgewood.

After the turnover in January, a hearing is now set for Sept. 18.

NBR attorney Michele Donato originally claimed that the suit "would not be settled until [the parties] had a written stipulation and … had agreed upon the terms of the settlement in its entirety," but that "it [became] apparent that [the parties] had a significant misunderstanding as to what had been agreed to."

On the other hand, Edgewood attorney Doug Wolfson claimed the parties had in fact come to an agreement, including the payment of a confidential amount by Edgewood to NBR, the understanding that no statements would be made to the press outside of a joint press release and that both parties would abide by a mutual nondisparagement agreement. According to the appellate document, Wolfson said his records showed a settlement was reached on Sept. 13, 2005, and that additional settlement requests were not presented by Donato until the beginning of October.

"We feel that there was never any settlement made, just an exploration of the idea of a settlement," NBR trustee Larry Witlen said.

The contention of NBR is that although they wish to see the land as open space, they prefer the original zoning of residential as opposed to high-density housing because of the traffic, environmental, school and quality of life impacts they believe the Cascades at North Brunswick development would bring. The Planning Board approval in April 2005 allots for 325 homes, including 131 singlefamily homes worth around $600,000 each, 114 condo flats around $250,000 each, and 80 townhouses around $425,000 each, as well as a clubhouse and other amenities.

Residents have continually expressed their concerns as to the affordability of the homes, traffic, pollution, accessibility to Farrington Lake, and the township's need for open space. Township officials said that there was no choice about developing the land other than taking it by condemnation, because the property owners would not sell. They also said the project could generate $2.45 million for the local school district without adding school-age children, and there will also be a donation of $3,500 per unit for the township's Senior Building Fund.

"This is the last farm in North Brunswick. It is a piece of lakefront property accessible to the community. To me, it needs to be preserved," said NBR member Rita Goldstein. "It's such a valuable asset for the community to enjoy but we're faced with hundreds of high-density homes."

"Our objections have always been that this is not in keeping with the neighborhood," Witlen added.

However, the hearing next month will not determine if the zoning is acceptable or must be changed; instead, it will determine if the two organizations ever reached an amicable agreement. After the hearing, if the judge declares that there was in fact a settlement, NBR's mission is finished and Edgewood can continue with their development plans. On the other hand, if there was no settlement, then the case can move to trial and the zoning will then be challenged, according to Witlen.

In the meantime, NBR has retained Stuart Lieberman, a lawyer specializing in environmental and land use law. The venue was changed to Monmouth County to ensure a fair trial and Paul Matacera, a former mayor of North Brunswick and representative of Edgewood, was removed as an arbitrator in the case.

Yet despite the ongoing legal disputes, the developer has had the right to begin construction when he sees fit with the agreement that if a settlement in favor of NBR is granted, he must tear down any buildings he has already constructed. As of last week, the farm had hundreds of stalks of corn still growing and the farmhouse, dating back to the late 18th century, has not yet been touched and is being evaluated as a possible historical landmark as well as a possible site of slave graves.

"Every year there is a corn crop it's a victory," Goldstein said.

In the meantime, NBR is seeking new members and donations from the community in order to pursue the fight against the development. The process thus far has cost about $30,000. Anyone interested in joining NBR can visit www.SavethePuldaFarm.org.

Dear North Brunswick residents:
As you may know, we have a new lawyer, Stuart Lieberman, working on our case (www.LiebermanBlecher.com). He specializes in environmental and land use law. He has successfully blocked development plans of major companies: a Major Drug Store Chain was prevented from Destroying a Significant Revolutionary Ware Battlefield Site in Edison. He prevailed in an Environmental Litigation Against Exxon Mobil Corporation. Currently he is the lawyer opposing Morris in Franklin Township and helping save the Evans Forney house in Milltown. He has moved forward to take the depositions to establish, contrary to the allegations by our opponents, that no settlement had been agreed to. He is ready to litigate this matter and then proceed to our actual case against the Planned Adult Community (PAC), which our township has approved, despite vocal opposition from you, our residents. Mr. Lieberman concurs with NBR that our case is solid. We think that the change of venue to Monmouth County should provide the fairness and impartiality to the court that a citizen's complaint such as ours is due. The Pulda Farm is still just that, a farm, and no additional traffic has mired Route 130.

NBR is also pursuing additional avenues for fundraising. This will include contacting concerned residents by phone asking for ideas and donations. We need donations of any size, big or small. Now is the time to stand up by sending the most generous contribution that you possibly can. I hope we didn't come this far to let our just cause die because of a lack of funds. NBR understands that not everyone in North Brunswick has the means to give big donations. All contributions will be gratefully accepted. Our website now accepts credit cards and PayPal by using the security and ease of the PayPal site. New: Donate using PayPal
DID WE MENTION THAT WE NEED YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO BE SUCCESSFUL?
Checks made to NBRAHDH should be sent to Larry Witlen, 5 Pleasant Place, No. Br. 08902

Your help is urgently needed. This is typical of traffic attempting to pass the Pulda Farm at rush hour. Imagine what it will be like after the addition of the transit village and 350 more units on the Pulda Farm that are yet to be built. Successfully fighting Jack Morris, the developer, requires substantial funds for lawyer fees. You can make a difference in the quality of life in North Brunswick. Please donate today.

 
Route 130 north at 8am between Adams lane & Washington ave   Route 130 south at 5pm between Washington & Adams lane

May 10 2007 North Brunswick Sentinel
North Brunswick Pulda farm fight is still far from over

I wish to commend the Appellate Court for its decision to reinstate the Pulda farm lawsuit. Their instruction that this case be heard in another county - away from political and personal agendas so prevalent in Middlesex County - is also a wise decision. Truly this is a victory for the "little guy."

Trustees of North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing (NBRAHDH) and their supporters are to be applauded for their perseverance. North Brunswick residents now have another opportunity to stop this farm from being destroyed. With the proposed development of the transit village a virtual certainty and constant additions to the Renaissance, North Brunswick should stop development of the last open space in our township.

Our seniors were supposed to benefit from the new adult community. Yet with a projected cost of condos ranging from $250,000 to $600,000 plus association fees, this development would not provide the affordable alternative for a senior that was originally promised. Rather, it promises even worse congestion on Route 130 and environmental degradation. The 365 proposed units would translate to at least 550 more drivers. Endangered environment and other environmental "details" the developer might leave behind, plus our tax dollars paying expanded sewer and other municipal services would minimize any tax benefit to us. My belief is that this land should be preserved as open space.

Go North Brunswick residents! Don't believe what some of your neighbors would have you think. This is not a done deal. We now have an opportunity to reverse the decision to allow the development of more high-density housing. Obviously the case has merit. NBRAHDH needs your help, and www.savethepuldafarm.org has information on what you can do to stop development. Donations and the hard work of a number of you have given us another chance to improve our town. You can make a real difference in the quality of life in North Brunswick.
Bunny Van Cise

http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0510/Letters/033.html

February 18, 2007 Star-Ledger Staff
BY DIANE C. WALSH
Score one for the little guy.
North Brunswick group wins battle on Pulda Farm. Lawsuit reopened against high-density development. When Lewinson entered the case, Superior Court Judge James Hurley had recently dismissed the lawsuit after concluding a settlement had been reached. But Lewinson and other members of her nonprofit organization questioned how the court accepted a settlement when they never authorized anything.

. Larry Witlen and Khalid Bajwa, two newly designated trustees, said they also do not understand Paul Matacera's role in the case. Matacera, a former North Brunswick mayor, said he was asked by Wolfson and Michele Donato, the resident group's former attorney, to be an intermediary. Matacera said he had a relationship with both attorneys.

Yet, the trustees were flabbergasted that Matacera would have any role since his brother-in-law is Morris' business partner, John Lynch, a former state senator now serving time in federal prison on corruption charges. Matacera is also the vice president of a lobbying firm whose client list includes Morris' firm, Edgewood Properties.

To read the entire article, please click here

01/26/07 Home News Tribune Online 01/26/07
Great News!
You may have read that Judge Hurley's ruling has been successfully appealed. The new hearing will be held in another county. Home news article has details
"NORTH BRUNSWICK — A lawsuit that names the Township Council and the Planning Board as defendants in a case involving the rezoning of the Pulda farm will be reinstated and must be heard outside of Middlesex County, according to a state appellate ruling Thursday. The judges found that a trial court did not have sufficient evidence to approve a purported settlement between developer Jack Morris and a group of township residents allied against high-density development of the 70-acre property." (Please click link to read the full article)

Please email us at info@savethepuldafarm.org for the latest details/developments.

February 1, 2007 Court reinstates suit by Pulda housing objectors
Judges rule settlement was not reached between developer and NBR

BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer
NORTH BRUNSWICK - A lawsuit filed by the North Brunswick Residents Against High-Density Housing (NBR) regarding the age-restricted community to be built on the former Pulda farm was reinstated by the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division on Jan. 25.
To read the entire article, please click here

January 11, 2007 The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0111/Letters/026.html
It's not too late to save North Brunswick's Pulda farm
With the lack of information to the contrary, we will have to assume that it will only be a matter of time before the bulldozers come to the Pulda farm in North Brunswick. But all is not lost - it still is not over. The township has just been handed another silver bullet to prevent this from happening.

During the two-plus years of discussions, meetings and arguments about development of the Pulda farm, one unanimous theme was always present. Each and every person, regardless of their viewpoint - except of course the builder - agreed the best use of the land would be as open space. But at the time, the township administration was unwilling to invoke eminent domain against the Pulda family, which would have been the only means to save the farm as open space.

However, the New Jersey Supreme Court set a precedent by ruling in a 6-1 decision on Dec. 7 by affirming the Appellate Division opinion in Mount Laurel vs. MiPro Homes, LLC. This precedent allows towns to use eminent domain to obtain land for open space from developers, even if preliminary construction has already started.

So let Edgewood properties purchase the Pulda farm and simply take advantage of this precedent. In this manner the land is taken not from "a poor farmer," but from a multimillion-dollar corporation. No construction means zero impact on the schools. Also, there should no longer be the concern to please a certain political power broker. He is currently in jail.

Yes, there will likely be a small impact on our municipal tax rate. But our taxes are already so outrageously high, it probably would not even be noticed. At least it would be for a good cause. As was indicated many times before, it is the North Brunswick Township administration that has all the power to prevent the Pulda farm from being destroyed. Don't let yet another opportunity to save it pass us by!

If there must be construction, high density housing, etc., let it be at the proposed transit village. This location can properly handle any added traffic, and is not the last large tract of pristine land remaining in North Brunswick.

Keith Silverman

North Brunswick

 
 
Here is more of the same from our 'favorite' developer...
New Bruns. development is delayed
Loews' parent company sues city, Planning Board
Home News Tribune Online 09/27/07

By RICHARD KHAVKINE: STAFF WRITER rkhavkine@thnt.co

NEW BRUNSWICK — A solitary jogger ran the length of the Loews parking lot off Route 1 under Thursday's afternoon sun.

But for a thick canopy of trees hard by the theater complex's westernmost boundary, he would have had a clear view of the Raritan River below.

And, according to redevelopment plans for the sprawling 23-acre site unveiled two years ago this week, the jogger should by now have had an unobstructed sightline to the river, Donaldson Park across the river in Highland Park, and beyond.

But the timeline for Raritan Heights, a proposed development of more than 400 luxury condominium units and about 40,000 square feet of retail space, was set askew by a lawsuit initiated 14 months ago by the theater's parent company, AMC Entertainment.

The suit seeks to invalidate the city's June 2006 designation of the site, excluding the theater and a parking lot overlooking Route 1, as an area in need of redevelopment.

The suit names 19 US Highway 1 LLC, which is associated with Piscataway-based Edgewood Properties; the New Brunswick City Council; and the city's Planning Board as defendants.

According to initial plans, made public in 2005 by Mayor Jim Cahill and Edgewood's principal owner, Jack Morris, Raritan Heights would have welcomed its first tenants this past summer.

But the theater company, claiming that its business interests and property rights were infringed by the designation, sued, putting the project on hold.

The theater opened in 1996, having secured a 20-year lease and five 5-year options from the site's previous owner, Sheldon Elizabeth & Co, whose plans for additional retail nearby never materialized. The theater pays an annual rent of about $1 million.

Included in the lease was a provision that precluded the site's owner from building north of a so-called "no-build line," which extends from just south of the 18-screen theater complex, without the theater's approval. The theater's parent company considered that restriction "an important bargained-for consideration" when it signed the lease, the suit contends.

But, according to conceptual drawings, some portions of Raritan Heights, including condominiums and a five-deck residential garage, would extend north of the line and into the theater's rear parking lot. The developer, though, would replace those lost parking spaces with a 302-space, three-deck garage on the slice of property nearest the Donald Goodkind Bridge.

 

The suit also contends that the city's redevelopment designation did not follow a thorough investigation or statutory protocols but was instead based on "assumptions and anecdotal information."

The two sides, through their attorneys, are attempting to resolve the issue before the suit goes to trial in Middlesex County Superior Court early next year.

The parties are said to be close to an agreement. Citing the sensitivity of negotiations, though, attorneys for both sides declined to speak in detail about the discussions.

"There's litigation, and the parties are trying to address the issues," an attorney representing the 19 US Highway 1 corporation, Robert Beckelman, said Thursday. Beckelman, though, added that he believed the discussions were "fruitful."

Robert J. Inglima Jr., who represents the theater company, echoed his counterpart in declining to address details.

But should the parties not arrive at a resolution before early 2008, when the suit is scheduled to be heard, a state Supreme Court decision this year could have some bearing on the outcome.

The court's ruling invalidated municipalities' ability to seize property through eminent domain simply because land was deemed "not fully productive." The court also ruled that authorities must instead meet a strict definition of blight.

While Morris still owns the property he purchased for nearly $15 million in July 2004, the city's action could still be subject to the mid-June ruling. The Planning Board report that led to the redevelopment designation cited "a lack of proper utilization of the area resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of the land."

Other than the 18-screen theater, Famous Dave's Barbeque restaurant is the only other business on the tract. Famous Dave's would be relocated to a new building on the property, according to conceptual plans.

Designating the site in need of redevelopment ostensibly gave the city increased control over the project, city officials said.

While the board already has amended the tract's zoning to allow for Raritan Heights' mixed use components, Edgewood still must meet requisite approvals from the city's Planning Board.

Since Raritan Heights would be built in a designated urban enterprise zone, Edgewood — which has built several residential and commercial developments in the city, including the Fulton Square town-house development and the Brunswick Town Center at Jersey Avenue and Handy Street — would be eligible for a tax abatement. But Edgewood has been a good partner as the city moves forward with its redevelopment plans, city spokesman Bill Bray said this week.

"They do what they say they are going to do," Bray said. "Edgewood is swinging hammers in the city as we speak. When you have a developer who performs you want to continue working with that developer. The goal is to get the development project done."


Petition urges new boundaries for building near Lawrence Brook
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
BY NAWAL QAROONI Star-Ledger Staff
A group of Milltown activists are petitioning state environmental protection officials to reclassify the Lawrence Brook as a Category One waterway, which would provide further safeguards for the Raritan River tributary.

Milltowners for a Sensible Ford Avenue Redevelopment collected signatures of nearly 700 people who hope to change the brook's classification, forcing all development to move between 150 to 300 feet away from the water line instead of the usual 50 foot buffer.

The petition is slated to be sent to the state Department of Environmental Protection by the end of the month.

"Almost everyone we talked to say they want to protect the drinking water and the fish," said Charles Jegou, president of the group. "The residents of central New Jersey are surprised this already hasn't happened."

The tributary, which runs about 20 miles long, is a public water supply for the residents of Milltown, New Brunswick, North Brunswick, and Franklin Township in Somerset County through the New Brunswick Water Utility. It has been used as drinking water since the 1860s.

Signers of the petition-- largely Milltown residents-- say development near the water would cause harmful substances to seep in from parked cars or excess construction. A variety of animals depend on the water for survival, and fishermen frequent it throughout the year.

 

The group's petition is supported by the borough's environmental commission, the Lawrence Brook Watershed Partnership and the Edison Wetlands Association.

In the past, concerned residents have sent letters to the DEP about the designation upgrade and received denials.

"Rarely does a day go by that people are not fishing in the Mill Pond or Lawrence Brook-- a rare occurrence in Central New Jersey today," said one letter to the DEP, written by resident Ralph Miller. "Unquestionably, this watershed is an irreplaceable asset."

Leslie McGeorge, administrator at the DEP, responded to another resident-- Lois Schmidt's-- letter a month ago.

"Upgrades to the anti-degradation designation are accomplished through rulemaking. Lawrence Brook and Mill Pond were not included in May 2007 proposal for Category One designation," the letter stated. "Therefore, these waters can not be upgraded at this time."

But Michael Shakarjan, vice chair of the borough's environmental commission, said those who care about clean water still have hope.

"At this stage, we see improved designation of the waterway as simply a no-brainer, and any other outcome would be just plain irresponsible," Shakarjan said. "Those of us with a drinking water glass in our hand know this makes the most sense."

Nawal Qarooni may be reached at nqarooni@starledger.com or (732) 404-8082.


There's a better way to save farmland
Home News Tribune Online 05/6/07
An Appellate Court gave the state an important tool for preserving the state's farming industry last week when it
unanimously ruled that New Jersey need not match developers dollar for dollar when it tries to buy temporarily protected farmland. The court said farmers in the state's temporary protection program — which gives farmers access to state grants in return for voluntarily agreeing not to sell their farm for development for eight years, and which gives the state the right of first refusal if the farmer does sell within that time frame — must sell his land to the state if the state's offer is "substantially similar" to the developers'.
Click here for Home News editorial
  2007/01/18 Builder's projects get fed scrutiny -- Subpoena seeks Jack Morris files
JOE TYRRELL STAR-LEDGER STAFF The U.S. Attorney's Office has subpoenaed all records of Somerville's dealings with builder Jack Morris since 2003, when the borough chose him to undertake its showpiece redevelopment project that remains stalled. Mayor Brian Gallagher said he is unsure of details involving the probe, but the borough will "fully comply" and meet the Feb. 1 deadline to turn over voluminous documents. "We'll probably just dump the files and turn them over" rather than...

Home News Tribune Online 12/9/06
By DAVID STEGON STAFF WRITER
dstegon@thnt.com
FRANKLIN — The Democratic members of the Township Council and the "former head of a local political party" are accused of colluding with developer Jack Morris on the affordable housing plan to build 600 homes and a Home Depot on Bennetts Lane in a complaint filed in New Jersey Superior Court.
The complaint accuses the former party head, who is not named in the suit, of holding secret meetings late last year with the Township Council and Morris, violating the New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act, to persuade the council to approve Morris, a contributor to the party, as the developer for Bennetts Lane.

" I think that I can prove that the council violated the Open Public Meetings Act and therefore this project should be voided," said Stuart Lieberman of Princeton-based Lieberman & Blecher P.C., who is representing Franklin Residents Against Improper Development, a nonprofit organization against the development. "I believe very strongly that we can prove there was a conflict."
Louis Rainone, the township's attorney, said the suit, which is the third amendment to an original lawsuit brought almost a year ago, gives no factual evidence backing the claims.
" The first two amendments were thrown out by a judge, and this one will (be) as well," Rainone said. "Each time they presented their case, there has been no facts but just rumors, and they are looking for anything they can to get this project to go away."
The second amended complaint was thrown out two months ago but is under appeal. Lieberman said the third amended complaint, which was filed last week, is beginning the legal process, but it may have to wait for the other appeal to run its course.
" Each time we go to court, the judge throws out only some of our complaint, so we are going forward with the parts that the judge has yet to decline," said Doris Bennett, a member of FRAID. "We just want people to know that this fight is not over, and this project has not yet been approved."
The suit claims that on July 1, 2005, the former head of one of the political parties ordered members of the Township Council and Planning Board to act for the benefit of Morris. The party head ordered that two Planning Board members not be reappointed to the board and be blacklisted for not going along with the project, the suit alleges.
One of the council members, who was not named but running for office, was intimidated and pressured to vote in support of Morris to repay a political friend, the suit said.
On Dec. 5, 2005, all but one member of the council attended a meeting at someone's house, and the business of both the council and Planning Board were discussed, specifically the affordable housing plan, the suit said.
Mayor Brian Levine, a Republican, said he was the one member of the council not at the meeting. Levine is the only Republican in an otherwise all-Democratic council.
" This concerns me a lot that there was a meeting to discuss who would be the beneficiary of a project worth tens of millions of dollars, and it was not in a public forum," Levine said yesterday, "especially with a person who has given money to their party. It's bothersome, and it violates the Open Public Meetings Act, and these meetings should have been aired publicly."
The suit also claims Deputy Mayor Ellen Ritchie, then a councilwoman, met in secret with Morris on Dec. 5, 2005 to discuss the project. Ritchie said yesterday she did meet with Morris, but she did not keep it a secret and was doing so on behalf of the people of Bennetts Lane.
" I was there for them to request the project be lower density and try to work with him for the best thing for the community," Ritchie said. "There was no secret meeting or anything like that. This group is grasping at straws and frankly this suit has been going on for more than a year. I just wish it would go away."
Bill Grippo, a former head of the Democratic Party, declined to comment on the suit, saying he is retired from local politics and focusing on his role as a middle school principal.
David Stegon:
(732) 565-7251

The 05/31/05 home news article is just another example of the political manipulation and trickery that is prevalent with the Pulda Farm topic. No where does the article mention the NBRAHDH lawsuit, which is still in effect. Both the township and the builder want you to believe that we have gone away. Sorry to disappoint them. WE ARE STILL HERE! No decision or settlement of concessions has occurred. We are about 6 months away from going to trial. The builder has every right to build if he wants. Only thing is, If we win our case, he has to tear it all down! Note the back peddling of our administration on the cost of these units!

There are other interesting articles related to this issue. What amazes all of us is the blatant efforts to manipulate the political field in this town. It's out in the open, there is no effort to even try to hid it anymore. What is even more amazing is so many of the citizens of North Brunswick do not seem to care?? Read some of these articles. This is all real, we could not make up this stuff even if we tried:

Lets spend our taxpayers money for polluted property that we cannot use:
http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/20
05/0317/Front_page/017.html


Womack is using his 'own money' to pay for a trip for our seniors. Sound like trying to buy votes to us!:


How about this letter mailed to everyone's home? Remember to ask where does the money for this mailing come from??? We especially like the line "By controlling the party, a small group of men were able to control our town government". Pulda Farm -We rest our case....
Democrats in Support of Open Government

Letter from: Mayor Francis "Mac" Womack Council President Carlo Socio Council Vice-President Bob Davis Councilman Ralph Andrews Councilperson Rhonda Lyles

Dear Fellow Democrat:
There is an important election for control of the Democratic Party in North Brunswick on June 7, 2005. Since there are no presidential, gubernatorial, mayoral, or other "glamour" races on the ballot, the turnout will be small and every vote will carry great weight.
Why is it important that you vote on June 7th? Because this election will select committee members to the North Brunswick Democratic Organization (NBDO), and it is the NBDO that controls selection of candidates for mayor and township council. Through this process old­fashioned party bosses controlled North Brunswick's government for years. Two years ago we led a movement to reform the North Brunswick Democratic Organization and make it an "open" organization where candidates are selected in an open, public process based on their ability and their character. We believe that for too long the North Brunswick Democratic Organization had been a political machine. By controlling the party, a small group of men were able to control our town government. They collected favors from friends while excluding all voices of dissent.

For the two last years, we have been true to our promise to make government in North Brunswick an open, transparent process. We believe that our Democratic Party should be no less open and no less responsive to residents. ANTHONY DIDOMENICO & CAROL WOMACK stand with us in promising a political process that remains open to all people, not just the select few. They will work with you, and with us - your elected officials - to put in place procedures and policies ensuring that your Democratic Party, and your elected Democratic officials, are responsive, professional, and accountable. Gone are the days when you have to know a politician to get something accomplished in North Brunswick! Thank you for your continued support.

Womack, Mayor Carlo Socio, Council President
ELECT ANTHONY DI DOMENICO & CAROL WOMACK

DISTRICT 7 DEMOCRATIC COMMITEE PERSONS, COLUMN' A' FOR AN OPEN DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN NORTH BRUNSWICK POLLS ARE OPEN TUESDAY. JUNE 7m FROM 6 AM TO 8 PM

Paid for By Dems. For Coot. Refonn, C. Zangara, Treasur e

 

July 4th, 2006
Don't let the newspapers, local politicians or others fool you.
NBRAHDH is still around and fighting.
The Pulda farm is still growing corn. Building would have begun if our case did not have merit. The developer does not want to restore the land to its original state should they lose their lawsuit. Three new trustees are now in place: Khalid Bajwa, Larry Witlen and John Calefato. The case is now progressing. Our primary goal is to preserve this area situated on Farrington Lake as open space for the enjoyment of current residents and generations to come. (click here to link to our objectives.) We need your support. For questions or to receive updates when they happen, please email Larry Witlen (lisawitlen@aol.com), and ask to be placed on our email list.

Why is it that every neighboring town to North Brunswick is constantly adding to their open space inventory. Town after Town are putting up signs proudly showing how they have saved a parcel of land for open space. Every town is working on adding open space EXCEPT North Brunswick. What's wrong with this picture??? Here is yet another example of land being saved: http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2005/0526/Front
_Page/002.html


Transit village fixed with Pulda Farm
Home News Tribune Online 08/29/06
The Lawrence Brook Watershed Partnership, as stewards of the watershed, are concerned about erosion of local water quality, fragmentation of wildlife habitat, and loss of farms, open space, and quality of life. We endorse the tenets of smart growth and the recommendations for their implementation, as outlined in New Jersey Future's "4 Ways to Genuine Prosperity." As such, our organization supports the adoption of the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) option to the proposed North Brunswick Transit Village.
The proposal to build a transit village at the current Johnson & Johnson site on Route 1 in North Brunswick has drawn a great deal of positive interest. Benefits potentially include an integrated transportation center within easy walking distance of residences, commercial establishments, plus modern community and municipal services. This great increase in convenience should reduce our dependency upon the personal automobile and could give North Brunswick a world-class "Smart Growth" development that is not only a model for towns in New Jersey but throughout the entire country.
However, one serious concern with establishing a transit village is the large number of residential units such a plan would add in order for it to meet approval by the state Department of Transportation. As proposed, this project would grow the population of North Brunswick to levels exceeding the current build-out figures. Along with these additional residents come the obligatory increased costs to North Brunswick taxpayers for schooling and community services. Net benefits of a transit village would be offset by tax implications and an over-population of the town.
Yet there is a tool available to the town that could save it from overdevelopment and has the added benefit of economically preserving open space and environmentally sensitive areas.
Transfer of Development Rights is an option, recently approved by the state, that allows municipalities to move development from one area to another where it is more desired. For instance, housing credits in "numbers of units" may be transferred from a remote or environmentally sensitive parcel (sending area) to a specially designated area closer to schools, transportation, and community services (receiving area).
Where would development rights be transferred from? Examples in the township include the undeveloped and environmentally sensitive lands near Farrington Lake, such as the Skaritka, Johnkin and Pulda properties. A TDR from the Pulda Farm alone, with its approvals for 325 age-restricted units, would certainly help the transit village proposal win acceptance without significantly adding population burden to the town beyond that which has already been approved.
While there are legal and administrative complexities to successful TDR implementation, assistance from state and nonprofit organizations, as well as grants from the NJ TDR Bank Board, are available. Such a transfer could help protect Farrington Lake's already compromised ecology and save one of the last working farms in the town. If the transit village project includes TDR, it would go from being a microcosm of well-designed development to true smart growth for the entire township.
Mayor Womack has taken interest in the TDR concept. We encourage him to seriously consider its benefits and we offer whatever assistance and support we can provide. Addition of TDR to the current Transit Village proposal would clearly represent a win-win opportunity for residents of North Brunswick and should be aggressively pursued.
Alan S.Godber
President, Board of Trustees
Lawrence Brook Watershed Partnership, Inc. MILLTOWN

The final decision of the Planning Board on the Pulda Farm:

http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/
2005/0505/Front_Page/002.html


It's the evil of men and isn't of God
Home News Tribune Online 08/29/06
In response to the article from Rick Harrison in his column:


God does not let bad things happen. It's the fault of the people — of the people who do not live up to his commandments which God asked us to follow. If people lived according to the commandants there would be no greed, lust, murder, wars, etc., and we would have a Garden of Eden on Earth.
It is not the work of God when bad things happen, it is the corrupt souls and minds of people who choose to live by laws of their own making.
Therefore, Rick Harrison, let your conscience be your guide. God gave us a perfect world but mankind is bent on destroying it. That is where you should place the blame.
Ann Czok
EAST BRUNSWICK

 

 
 
top    

NBRAHDH: North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing
check back for updates