Press
Release
A group of concerned
citizens who call themselves ‘The
North Brunswick Residents Against
High Density Housing’, also
known as “NBR,” announced
today the filing of a lawsuit against
the Township of North Brunswick
challenging the legality of a recent
Township decision to rezone the
Pulda farm, the last farm in the
Township, for high density housing. “We
have retained attorney Michele
Donato, one of the state’s
foremost authorities on land use
law and she has advised us that
we have a good chance of having
the rezoning change invalidated,” said
Ben Galioto, spokesman for the
group.
Despite overwhelming
opposition and a petition signed
by 880 residents, the current council
members voted 4-2 to rezone this
land on August 2, 2004. The Pulda
farm, a seventy acre parcel of
land, has been zoned R1 (single
family low density residential)
since at least 1984. Since 1994,
the Master Plan has proposed the
farm for estate zoning and public
purposes. The recent change to
Planned Adult Community or PAC
(high-density housing) is inconsistent
with this long term planning and
is not based on the suitability
of the land for such high-density
housing. The PAC would allow for
345 units including three 50-foot
tall buildings. The R1 zoning would
have allowed for a maximum of 80
homes. “Since council members
Socio, Davis, Chandlee and Lyles
chose to ignore the opinion of
nearly 1000 tax paying citizens
who signed the petition and continued
with the rezoning of a PAC, residents
were forced to explore other means
to prevent this rezoning,” Galioto
added.
|
|
A
conscientious group of residents united to
form a non-profit organization in order to
challenge the rezoning. “If a PAC is
permitted on this property, it will forever
affect the quality of life for North Brunswick
residents who live on or near Route 130. In
addition, development at the density proposed
will negatively affect Farrington Lake, a drinking
water source. NBR is determined to see the
Pulda farm become open space and to assure
that the owner receives fair market value for
the property. We will exhaust every avenue
possible to see this beautiful parcel of land
preserved undeveloped so that every resident
and future generations can enjoy this land.” commented
Keith Silverman an organization trustee, “NBR
feels strongly about the need to maintain this
property as open space due to the environmental
impact of 345 units, 600-700 residents and
just as many additional cars.”
“The Mayor has
challenged our integrity on local
television suggesting that we have
not been ‘completely truthful’ because
our legal challenge can be only
to the zoning change. It is he
who has not been completely truthful
about the exorbitant financial
gain the zoning change has created
for the developer, who is one of
the largest contributors to the
Political Action Committee that
supported Womack’s election
campaign,” said Barbara Lewinson
Esq. Spokeswoman and assisting
legal counsel. Lewinson continued, “Make
no mistake, this legal challenge
is but the first battle of the
war. Our ultimate goal is the preservation
of this property as open space
consistent with the long term planning
goals of the Township.”
Residents are invited
to visit www.savethepuldafarm.org
to learn more about this issue
and how they can help.
|