| |
Note:
Hearing has been rescheduled for Sept. 24
Development
heading to court for hearing Sept. 18
BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer: The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0907/front_page/010.html
NORTH BRUNSWICK - There is still a chance that the Pulda farm
along Georges Road and Route 130 will not be developed as high-density
housing.
North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing (NBR),
a citizens group composed of about 500 residents who oppose building
a condensed housing development on the last farm in the township,
has taken issue with the zoning of the property being changed
from residential to planned adult community. Although the lawyer
for Edgewood Properties, the developer of the 67-acre farm, had
said his firm made an agreement with NBR to settle the issue,
the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division reinstated
the lawsuit brought forth by NBR. That lawsuit questioned whether
a settlement had been reached by the grassroots organization
and Edgewood.
After the turnover in January, a hearing is now set for Sept.
18.
NBR attorney Michele Donato
originally claimed that the suit "would
not be settled until [the parties] had a written stipulation
and … had agreed upon the terms of the settlement in its
entirety," but that "it [became] apparent that [the
parties] had a significant misunderstanding as to what had been
agreed to."
On the other hand, Edgewood attorney Doug Wolfson claimed the
parties had in fact come to an agreement, including the payment
of a confidential amount by Edgewood to NBR, the understanding
that no statements would be made to the press outside of a joint
press release and that both parties would abide by a mutual nondisparagement
agreement. According to the appellate document, Wolfson said
his records showed a settlement was reached on Sept. 13, 2005,
and that additional settlement requests were not presented by
Donato until the beginning of October.
"We feel that there was never any settlement made, just
an exploration of the idea of a settlement," NBR trustee
Larry Witlen said.
The contention of NBR is that although they wish to see the
land as open space, they prefer the original zoning of residential
as opposed to high-density housing because of the traffic, environmental,
school and quality of life impacts they believe the Cascades
at North Brunswick development would bring. The Planning Board
approval in April 2005 allots for 325 homes, including 131 singlefamily
homes worth around $600,000 each, 114 condo flats around $250,000
each, and 80 townhouses around $425,000 each, as well as a clubhouse
and other amenities.
Residents have continually expressed their concerns as to the
affordability of the homes, traffic, pollution, accessibility
to Farrington Lake, and the township's need for open space. Township
officials said that there was no choice about developing the
land other than taking it by condemnation, because the property
owners would not sell. They also said the project could generate
$2.45 million for the local school district without adding school-age
children, and there will also be a donation of $3,500 per unit
for the township's Senior Building Fund.
"This is the last farm in North Brunswick. It is a piece
of lakefront property accessible to the community. To me, it
needs to be preserved," said NBR member Rita Goldstein. "It's
such a valuable asset for the community to enjoy but we're faced
with hundreds of high-density homes."
"Our objections have always been that this is not in keeping
with the neighborhood," Witlen added.
However, the hearing next month will not determine if the zoning
is acceptable or must be changed; instead, it will determine
if the two organizations ever reached an amicable agreement.
After the hearing, if the judge declares that there was in fact
a settlement, NBR's mission is finished and Edgewood can continue
with their development plans. On the other hand, if there was
no settlement, then the case can move to trial and the zoning
will then be challenged, according to Witlen.
In the meantime, NBR has retained Stuart Lieberman, a lawyer
specializing in environmental and land use law. The venue was
changed to Monmouth County to ensure a fair trial and Paul Matacera,
a former mayor of North Brunswick and representative of Edgewood,
was removed as an arbitrator in the case.
Yet despite the ongoing legal disputes, the developer has had
the right to begin construction when he sees fit with the agreement
that if a settlement in favor of NBR is granted, he must tear
down any buildings he has already constructed. As of last week,
the farm had hundreds of stalks of corn still growing and the
farmhouse, dating back to the late 18th century, has not yet
been touched and is being evaluated as a possible historical
landmark as well as a possible site of slave graves.
"Every year there is a corn crop it's a victory," Goldstein
said.
In the meantime, NBR is seeking new members and donations from
the community in order to pursue the fight against the development.
The process thus far has cost about $30,000. Anyone interested
in joining NBR can visit www.SavethePuldaFarm.org.
Dear North
Brunswick residents:
As you may know, we have a new lawyer, Stuart
Lieberman, working on our case (www.LiebermanBlecher.com).
He specializes in environmental
and land use law. He has successfully blocked development plans
of major companies: a Major Drug Store Chain was prevented from
Destroying a Significant Revolutionary Ware Battlefield Site in
Edison. He prevailed in an Environmental Litigation Against Exxon
Mobil Corporation. Currently he is the lawyer opposing Morris in
Franklin Township and helping save the Evans Forney house in Milltown.
He has moved forward to take the depositions to establish, contrary
to the allegations by our opponents, that no settlement had been
agreed to. He is ready to litigate this matter and then proceed
to our actual case against the Planned Adult Community (PAC), which
our township has approved, despite vocal opposition from you, our
residents. Mr. Lieberman concurs with NBR that our case is solid.
We think that the change of venue to Monmouth County should provide
the fairness and impartiality to the court that a citizen's complaint
such as ours is due. The Pulda Farm is still just that, a farm,
and no additional traffic has mired Route 130.
NBR
is also pursuing additional avenues for fundraising. This will
include contacting concerned residents by phone asking for
ideas and donations. We need donations of any size, big or small.
Now is the time to stand up by sending the most generous contribution
that you possibly can. I hope we didn't come this far to let
our just cause die because of a lack of funds. NBR understands
that not everyone in North Brunswick has the means to give big
donations. All contributions will be gratefully accepted. Our
website now accepts credit cards and PayPal by using the security
and ease of the PayPal site. New: Donate
using PayPal
DID WE MENTION
THAT WE NEED YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO BE SUCCESSFUL?
Checks made to NBRAHDH should
be sent to Larry Witlen,
5 Pleasant Place, No. Br. 08902
Your
help is urgently needed. This is typical
of traffic attempting to pass the Pulda Farm at rush hour. Imagine
what it will be like after the addition of the transit
village and 350 more units on the Pulda Farm that are yet to be
built. Successfully fighting Jack Morris, the developer, requires
substantial funds for lawyer fees. You can make a difference
in the quality
of life in North Brunswick. Please donate today.
|
|
|
|
| Route 130 north at 8am between Adams lane & Washington
ave |
|
Route 130 south at 5pm between Washington & Adams lane |
May 10 2007 North Brunswick Sentinel
North Brunswick
Pulda farm fight is still far from over
I wish to commend the Appellate Court for its
decision to reinstate the Pulda farm lawsuit. Their instruction that
this case be heard
in another county - away from political and personal agendas so
prevalent in Middlesex County - is also a wise decision. Truly
this is a victory for the "little guy."
Trustees of North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing
(NBRAHDH) and their supporters are to be applauded for their perseverance.
North Brunswick residents now have another opportunity to stop this
farm from being destroyed. With the proposed development of the transit
village a virtual certainty and constant additions to the Renaissance,
North Brunswick should stop development of the last open space in
our township.
Our seniors were supposed to benefit
from the new adult community. Yet with a projected cost of condos
ranging
from $250,000 to $600,000
plus association fees, this development would not provide the affordable
alternative for a senior that was originally promised. Rather, it
promises even worse congestion on Route 130 and environmental degradation.
The 365 proposed units would translate to at least 550 more drivers.
Endangered environment and other environmental "details" the
developer might leave behind, plus our tax dollars paying expanded
sewer and other municipal services would minimize any tax benefit
to us. My belief is that this land should be preserved as open space.
Go North Brunswick residents! Don't believe what some of your neighbors
would have you think. This is not a done deal. We now have an opportunity
to reverse the decision to allow the development of more high-density
housing. Obviously the case has merit. NBRAHDH needs your help, and
www.savethepuldafarm.org has information on what you can do to stop
development. Donations and the hard work of a number of you have
given us another chance to improve our town. You can make a real
difference in the quality of life in North Brunswick.
Bunny Van Cise
http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0510/Letters/033.html
February
18, 2007 Star-Ledger Staff
BY DIANE C. WALSH
Score one for the little guy.
North Brunswick group wins battle on
Pulda Farm. Lawsuit reopened against high-density development.
When Lewinson entered the case, Superior Court Judge James Hurley
had recently dismissed the lawsuit after concluding a settlement
had been reached. But Lewinson and other members of her nonprofit
organization questioned how the court accepted a settlement when
they never authorized anything.
. Larry Witlen and Khalid Bajwa, two
newly designated trustees, said they also do not understand Paul
Matacera's role in the case. Matacera, a former
North Brunswick mayor, said he was asked by Wolfson and Michele Donato, the
resident group's former attorney, to be an intermediary. Matacera
said he had a relationship with both attorneys.
Yet, the trustees were flabbergasted
that Matacera would
have any role since
his brother-in-law is Morris' business
partner, John Lynch, a
former state senator now serving
time in federal prison on corruption charges. Matacera
is also the vice president of a lobbying firm whose client list includes
Morris'
firm, Edgewood Properties.
To read the entire article, please
click here
01/26/07 Home
News Tribune Online 01/26/07
Great
News! You may have read that Judge
Hurley's ruling has been successfully appealed. The new hearing
will be held in another county. Home
news article has details
"NORTH BRUNSWICK — A lawsuit that
names the Township Council and the Planning Board as defendants in
a case involving
the rezoning of the Pulda farm will be reinstated and must be heard
outside of Middlesex County, according to a state appellate ruling
Thursday. The judges found that a trial court did not have sufficient
evidence to approve a purported settlement between developer Jack
Morris and a group of township residents allied against high-density
development of the 70-acre property." (Please click link to read
the full article)
Please email us
at info@savethepuldafarm.org for
the latest details/developments.
February 1, 2007 Court
reinstates suit by Pulda housing objectors
Judges rule settlement was not reached between developer and NBR
BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer
NORTH BRUNSWICK - A lawsuit filed by the North Brunswick Residents
Against High-Density Housing (NBR) regarding the age-restricted community
to be built on the former Pulda farm was reinstated by the Superior
Court of New Jersey Appellate Division on Jan. 25.
To read the entire article, please
click here
January 11, 2007 The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0111/Letters/026.html
It's not too late to save North Brunswick's Pulda
farm
With the lack of information to the contrary, we will have to assume
that it will only be a matter of time before the bulldozers come
to the Pulda farm in North Brunswick. But all is not lost - it still
is not over. The township has just been handed another silver
bullet to prevent this from happening.
During the two-plus years of discussions, meetings and arguments
about development of the Pulda farm, one unanimous theme was always
present. Each and every person, regardless of their viewpoint - except
of course the builder - agreed the best use of the land would be
as open space. But at the time, the township administration was unwilling
to invoke eminent domain against the Pulda family, which would have
been the only means to save the farm as open space.
However, the New Jersey Supreme Court set a precedent by ruling
in a 6-1 decision on Dec. 7 by affirming the Appellate Division opinion
in Mount Laurel vs. MiPro Homes, LLC. This precedent allows towns
to use eminent domain to obtain land for open space from developers,
even if preliminary construction has already started.
So let Edgewood properties purchase the Pulda
farm and simply take advantage of this precedent. In this manner
the land is taken not
from "a poor farmer," but from a multimillion-dollar corporation.
No construction means zero impact on the schools. Also, there should
no longer be the concern to please a certain political power broker.
He is currently in jail.
Yes, there will likely be a small impact on our municipal tax rate.
But our taxes are already so outrageously high, it probably would
not even be noticed. At least it would be for a good cause. As was
indicated many times before, it is the North Brunswick Township administration
that has all the power to prevent the Pulda farm from being destroyed.
Don't let yet another opportunity to save it pass us by!
If there must be construction, high density housing, etc., let it
be at the proposed transit village. This location can properly handle
any added traffic, and is not the last large tract of pristine land
remaining in North Brunswick.
Keith Silverman
North Brunswick
|