Save the Pulda Farm in North Brunswick, NJ
   
 

Note: Hearing has been rescheduled for Sept. 24
Development heading to court for hearing Sept. 18

BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer: The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0907/front_page/010.html


NORTH BRUNSWICK - There is still a chance that the Pulda farm along Georges Road and Route 130 will not be developed as high-density housing.

North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing (NBR), a citizens group composed of about 500 residents who oppose building a condensed housing development on the last farm in the township, has taken issue with the zoning of the property being changed from residential to planned adult community. Although the lawyer for Edgewood Properties, the developer of the 67-acre farm, had said his firm made an agreement with NBR to settle the issue, the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division reinstated the lawsuit brought forth by NBR. That lawsuit questioned whether a settlement had been reached by the grassroots organization and Edgewood.

After the turnover in January, a hearing is now set for Sept. 18.

NBR attorney Michele Donato originally claimed that the suit "would not be settled until [the parties] had a written stipulation and … had agreed upon the terms of the settlement in its entirety," but that "it [became] apparent that [the parties] had a significant misunderstanding as to what had been agreed to."

On the other hand, Edgewood attorney Doug Wolfson claimed the parties had in fact come to an agreement, including the payment of a confidential amount by Edgewood to NBR, the understanding that no statements would be made to the press outside of a joint press release and that both parties would abide by a mutual nondisparagement agreement. According to the appellate document, Wolfson said his records showed a settlement was reached on Sept. 13, 2005, and that additional settlement requests were not presented by Donato until the beginning of October.

"We feel that there was never any settlement made, just an exploration of the idea of a settlement," NBR trustee Larry Witlen said.

The contention of NBR is that although they wish to see the land as open space, they prefer the original zoning of residential as opposed to high-density housing because of the traffic, environmental, school and quality of life impacts they believe the Cascades at North Brunswick development would bring. The Planning Board approval in April 2005 allots for 325 homes, including 131 singlefamily homes worth around $600,000 each, 114 condo flats around $250,000 each, and 80 townhouses around $425,000 each, as well as a clubhouse and other amenities.

Residents have continually expressed their concerns as to the affordability of the homes, traffic, pollution, accessibility to Farrington Lake, and the township's need for open space. Township officials said that there was no choice about developing the land other than taking it by condemnation, because the property owners would not sell. They also said the project could generate $2.45 million for the local school district without adding school-age children, and there will also be a donation of $3,500 per unit for the township's Senior Building Fund.

"This is the last farm in North Brunswick. It is a piece of lakefront property accessible to the community. To me, it needs to be preserved," said NBR member Rita Goldstein. "It's such a valuable asset for the community to enjoy but we're faced with hundreds of high-density homes."

"Our objections have always been that this is not in keeping with the neighborhood," Witlen added.

However, the hearing next month will not determine if the zoning is acceptable or must be changed; instead, it will determine if the two organizations ever reached an amicable agreement. After the hearing, if the judge declares that there was in fact a settlement, NBR's mission is finished and Edgewood can continue with their development plans. On the other hand, if there was no settlement, then the case can move to trial and the zoning will then be challenged, according to Witlen.

In the meantime, NBR has retained Stuart Lieberman, a lawyer specializing in environmental and land use law. The venue was changed to Monmouth County to ensure a fair trial and Paul Matacera, a former mayor of North Brunswick and representative of Edgewood, was removed as an arbitrator in the case.

Yet despite the ongoing legal disputes, the developer has had the right to begin construction when he sees fit with the agreement that if a settlement in favor of NBR is granted, he must tear down any buildings he has already constructed. As of last week, the farm had hundreds of stalks of corn still growing and the farmhouse, dating back to the late 18th century, has not yet been touched and is being evaluated as a possible historical landmark as well as a possible site of slave graves.

"Every year there is a corn crop it's a victory," Goldstein said.

In the meantime, NBR is seeking new members and donations from the community in order to pursue the fight against the development. The process thus far has cost about $30,000. Anyone interested in joining NBR can visit www.SavethePuldaFarm.org.

Dear North Brunswick residents:
As you may know, we have a new lawyer, Stuart Lieberman, working on our case (www.LiebermanBlecher.com). He specializes in environmental and land use law. He has successfully blocked development plans of major companies: a Major Drug Store Chain was prevented from Destroying a Significant Revolutionary Ware Battlefield Site in Edison. He prevailed in an Environmental Litigation Against Exxon Mobil Corporation. Currently he is the lawyer opposing Morris in Franklin Township and helping save the Evans Forney house in Milltown. He has moved forward to take the depositions to establish, contrary to the allegations by our opponents, that no settlement had been agreed to. He is ready to litigate this matter and then proceed to our actual case against the Planned Adult Community (PAC), which our township has approved, despite vocal opposition from you, our residents. Mr. Lieberman concurs with NBR that our case is solid. We think that the change of venue to Monmouth County should provide the fairness and impartiality to the court that a citizen's complaint such as ours is due. The Pulda Farm is still just that, a farm, and no additional traffic has mired Route 130.

NBR is also pursuing additional avenues for fundraising. This will include contacting concerned residents by phone asking for ideas and donations. We need donations of any size, big or small. Now is the time to stand up by sending the most generous contribution that you possibly can. I hope we didn't come this far to let our just cause die because of a lack of funds. NBR understands that not everyone in North Brunswick has the means to give big donations. All contributions will be gratefully accepted. Our website now accepts credit cards and PayPal by using the security and ease of the PayPal site. New: Donate using PayPal
DID WE MENTION THAT WE NEED YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO BE SUCCESSFUL?
Checks made to NBRAHDH should be sent to Larry Witlen, 5 Pleasant Place, No. Br. 08902

Your help is urgently needed. This is typical of traffic attempting to pass the Pulda Farm at rush hour. Imagine what it will be like after the addition of the transit village and 350 more units on the Pulda Farm that are yet to be built. Successfully fighting Jack Morris, the developer, requires substantial funds for lawyer fees. You can make a difference in the quality of life in North Brunswick. Please donate today.

 
Route 130 north at 8am between Adams lane & Washington ave   Route 130 south at 5pm between Washington & Adams lane

May 10 2007 North Brunswick Sentinel
North Brunswick Pulda farm fight is still far from over

I wish to commend the Appellate Court for its decision to reinstate the Pulda farm lawsuit. Their instruction that this case be heard in another county - away from political and personal agendas so prevalent in Middlesex County - is also a wise decision. Truly this is a victory for the "little guy."

Trustees of North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing (NBRAHDH) and their supporters are to be applauded for their perseverance. North Brunswick residents now have another opportunity to stop this farm from being destroyed. With the proposed development of the transit village a virtual certainty and constant additions to the Renaissance, North Brunswick should stop development of the last open space in our township.

Our seniors were supposed to benefit from the new adult community. Yet with a projected cost of condos ranging from $250,000 to $600,000 plus association fees, this development would not provide the affordable alternative for a senior that was originally promised. Rather, it promises even worse congestion on Route 130 and environmental degradation. The 365 proposed units would translate to at least 550 more drivers. Endangered environment and other environmental "details" the developer might leave behind, plus our tax dollars paying expanded sewer and other municipal services would minimize any tax benefit to us. My belief is that this land should be preserved as open space.

Go North Brunswick residents! Don't believe what some of your neighbors would have you think. This is not a done deal. We now have an opportunity to reverse the decision to allow the development of more high-density housing. Obviously the case has merit. NBRAHDH needs your help, and www.savethepuldafarm.org has information on what you can do to stop development. Donations and the hard work of a number of you have given us another chance to improve our town. You can make a real difference in the quality of life in North Brunswick.
Bunny Van Cise

http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0510/Letters/033.html

February 18, 2007 Star-Ledger Staff
BY DIANE C. WALSH
Score one for the little guy.
North Brunswick group wins battle on Pulda Farm. Lawsuit reopened against high-density development. When Lewinson entered the case, Superior Court Judge James Hurley had recently dismissed the lawsuit after concluding a settlement had been reached. But Lewinson and other members of her nonprofit organization questioned how the court accepted a settlement when they never authorized anything.

. Larry Witlen and Khalid Bajwa, two newly designated trustees, said they also do not understand Paul Matacera's role in the case. Matacera, a former North Brunswick mayor, said he was asked by Wolfson and Michele Donato, the resident group's former attorney, to be an intermediary. Matacera said he had a relationship with both attorneys.

Yet, the trustees were flabbergasted that Matacera would have any role since his brother-in-law is Morris' business partner, John Lynch, a former state senator now serving time in federal prison on corruption charges. Matacera is also the vice president of a lobbying firm whose client list includes Morris' firm, Edgewood Properties.

To read the entire article, please click here

01/26/07 Home News Tribune Online 01/26/07
Great News!
You may have read that Judge Hurley's ruling has been successfully appealed. The new hearing will be held in another county. Home news article has details
"NORTH BRUNSWICK — A lawsuit that names the Township Council and the Planning Board as defendants in a case involving the rezoning of the Pulda farm will be reinstated and must be heard outside of Middlesex County, according to a state appellate ruling Thursday. The judges found that a trial court did not have sufficient evidence to approve a purported settlement between developer Jack Morris and a group of township residents allied against high-density development of the 70-acre property." (Please click link to read the full article)

Please email us at info@savethepuldafarm.org for the latest details/developments.

February 1, 2007 Court reinstates suit by Pulda housing objectors
Judges rule settlement was not reached between developer and NBR

BY JENNIFER AMATO Staff Writer
NORTH BRUNSWICK - A lawsuit filed by the North Brunswick Residents Against High-Density Housing (NBR) regarding the age-restricted community to be built on the former Pulda farm was reinstated by the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division on Jan. 25.
To read the entire article, please click here

January 11, 2007 The Sentinel http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2007/0111/Letters/026.html
It's not too late to save North Brunswick's Pulda farm
With the lack of information to the contrary, we will have to assume that it will only be a matter of time before the bulldozers come to the Pulda farm in North Brunswick. But all is not lost - it still is not over. The township has just been handed another silver bullet to prevent this from happening.

During the two-plus years of discussions, meetings and arguments about development of the Pulda farm, one unanimous theme was always present. Each and every person, regardless of their viewpoint - except of course the builder - agreed the best use of the land would be as open space. But at the time, the township administration was unwilling to invoke eminent domain against the Pulda family, which would have been the only means to save the farm as open space.

However, the New Jersey Supreme Court set a precedent by ruling in a 6-1 decision on Dec. 7 by affirming the Appellate Division opinion in Mount Laurel vs. MiPro Homes, LLC. This precedent allows towns to use eminent domain to obtain land for open space from developers, even if preliminary construction has already started.

So let Edgewood properties purchase the Pulda farm and simply take advantage of this precedent. In this manner the land is taken not from "a poor farmer," but from a multimillion-dollar corporation. No construction means zero impact on the schools. Also, there should no longer be the concern to please a certain political power broker. He is currently in jail.

Yes, there will likely be a small impact on our municipal tax rate. But our taxes are already so outrageously high, it probably would not even be noticed. At least it would be for a good cause. As was indicated many times before, it is the North Brunswick Township administration that has all the power to prevent the Pulda farm from being destroyed. Don't let yet another opportunity to save it pass us by!

If there must be construction, high density housing, etc., let it be at the proposed transit village. This location can properly handle any added traffic, and is not the last large tract of pristine land remaining in North Brunswick.

Keith Silverman

North Brunswick

 
 

 

Please check back soon as content is always being added.

NBRAHDH: North Brunswick Residents Against High Density Housing

Copyright © 2004